↓ Skip to main content

Profiling the Dead: Generating Microsatellite Data from Fossil Bones of Extinct Megafauna—Protocols, Problems, and Prospects

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profiling the Dead: Generating Microsatellite Data from Fossil Bones of Extinct Megafauna—Protocols, Problems, and Prospects
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten E. Allentoft, Charlotte Oskam, Jayne Houston, Marie L. Hale, M. Thomas P Gilbert, Morten Rasmussen, Peter Spencer, Christopher Jacomb, Eske Willerslev, Richard N. Holdaway, Michael Bunce

Abstract

We present the first set of microsatellite markers developed exclusively for an extinct taxon. Microsatellite data have been analysed in thousands of genetic studies on extant species but the technology can be problematic when applied to low copy number (LCN) DNA. It is therefore rarely used on substrates more than a few decades old. Now, with the primers and protocols presented here, microsatellite markers are available to study the extinct New Zealand moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes) and, as with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) technology, the markers represent a means by which the field of ancient DNA can (preservation allowing) move on from its reliance on mitochondrial DNA. Candidate markers were identified using high throughput sequencing technology (GS-FLX) on DNA extracted from fossil moa bone and eggshell. From the 'shotgun' reads, >60 primer pairs were designed and tested on DNA from bones of the South Island giant moa (Dinornis robustus). Six polymorphic loci were characterised and used to assess measures of genetic diversity. Because of low template numbers, typical of ancient DNA, allelic dropout was observed in 36-70% of the PCR reactions at each microsatellite marker. However, a comprehensive survey of allelic dropout, combined with supporting quantitative PCR data, allowed us to establish a set of criteria that maximised data fidelity. Finally, we demonstrated the viability of the primers and the protocols, by compiling a full Dinornis microsatellite dataset representing fossils of c. 600-5000 years of age. A multi-locus genotype was obtained from 74 individuals (84% success rate), and the data showed no signs of being compromised by allelic dropout. The methodology presented here provides a framework by which to generate and evaluate microsatellite data from samples of much greater antiquity than attempted before, and opens new opportunities for ancient DNA research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 74 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 32%
Researcher 26 32%
Student > Master 10 12%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 9%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 3 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,149,250
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,344
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,966
of 182,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#213
of 1,255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.