↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a multiple biomarker panel for diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of a multiple biomarker panel for diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Published in
BMC Neurology, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0689-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueping Chen, Yongping Chen, Qianqian Wei, Ruwei Ou, Bei Cao, Bi Zhao, Hui-Fang Shang

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess a panel of promising biomarkers for their ability to improve diagnosis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Forty patients with sporadic ALS and 40 controls with other neurological diseases were evaluated. Levels of phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNfH), S100-β, cystatin C, and chitotriosidase (CHIT) in cerebrospinal fluid were assayed using two-site solid-phase sandwich ELISA. Patients with sporadic ALS showed higher levels of pNfH and CHIT than controls, but lower levels of cystatin C. Multivariate logistic regression that adjusted for patient age and sex identified significant associations between sporadic ALS and levels of pNfH, CHIT and cystatin C. Levels of pNfH correlated positively with rate of progression and decline based on the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised. Based on receiver operating curve analysis, a pNfH cut-off of 437 ng/L discriminated patients from controls with a sensitivity of 97.3 % and specificity of 83.8 %. A CHIT cut-off of 1593.779 ng/L discriminated patients from controls with a sensitivity of 83.8 % and specificity of 81.1 %. Combining the two biomarkers gave a sensitivity of 83.8 % and specificity of 91.9 %. Levels of pNfH in cerebrospinal fluid may be a reliable biomarker for diagnosing ALS, and combining this biomarker with levels of CHIT may improve diagnostic accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 3%
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,272,223
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,223
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,785
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#36
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.