↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Functional Study of a New Missense Mutation in the Motor Head Domain of Myosin VIIA in a Family with Autosomal Dominant Hearing Impairment (DFNA11)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Functional Study of a New Missense Mutation in the Motor Head Domain of Myosin VIIA in a Family with Autosomal Dominant Hearing Impairment (DFNA11)
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing Sang, Xukun Yan, Huan Wang, Ruizhi Feng, Xiang Fei, Duan Ma, Qinghe Xing, Qiaoli Li, Xinzhi Zhao, Li Jin, Lin He, Huawei Li, Lei Wang

Abstract

The MYO7A encodes a protein classified as an unconventional myosin. Here, we present a family with non-syndromic autosomal dominant hearing impairment that clinically resembles other previously published DFNA11 families. Affected members of the family present with an ascending audiogram affecting low and middle frequencies at young ages and then affecting all frequencies with increasing age. Genome-wide linkage analysis using Illumina Cyto-12 Chip mapped the disease locus to the DFNA11 interval in the family. A c.2003G→A (p.R668H) mutation of the MYO7A, is heterozygous in all affected family members and absent in 100 healthy individuals. Arg668His is located in a region of the myosin VIIA motor domain that is highly conserved among different species. Molecular modeling predicts that the conserved R668 residue plays important structural role in linking different lobes of motor domain together. In the actin-activated ATPase activity assay, the rate of NADH oxidation was higher in the wild-type myosin VIIA, indicating that the ATPase activity in the p.R668H mutant myosin VIIA was significantly destroyed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,015
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,520
of 282,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,177
of 5,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.