↓ Skip to main content

Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rym Boulkedid, Hendy Abdoul, Marine Loustau, Olivier Sibony, Corinne Alberti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 16%
Researcher 179 14%
Student > Master 177 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 84 6%
Other 82 6%
Other 279 21%
Unknown 304 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 338 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 161 12%
Social Sciences 106 8%
Psychology 58 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 52 4%
Other 241 18%
Unknown 364 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,525
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,839
of 127,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#510
of 1,877 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,877 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.