↓ Skip to main content

Cortical Plasticity Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Wakefulness Affects Electroencephalogram Activity during Sleep

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical Plasticity Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Wakefulness Affects Electroencephalogram Activity during Sleep
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi De Gennaro, Fabiana Fratello, Cristina Marzano, Fabio Moroni, Giuseppe Curcio, Daniela Tempesta, Maria Concetta Pellicciari, Cornelia Pirulli, Michele Ferrara, Paolo Maria Rossini

Abstract

Sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) brain oscillations in the low-frequency range show local signs of homeostatic regulation after learning. Such increases and decreases of slow wave activity are limited to the cortical regions involved in specific task performance during wakefulness. Here, we test the hypothesis that reorganization of motor cortex produced by long-term potentiation (LTP) affects EEG activity of this brain area during subsequent sleep.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Neuroscience 21 18%
Psychology 14 12%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,327,422
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,974
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,853
of 82,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#429
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.