↓ Skip to main content

Kaguya, the first parthenogenetic mammal – engineering triumph or lottery winner?

Overview of attention for article published in Reproduction, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kaguya, the first parthenogenetic mammal – engineering triumph or lottery winner?
Published in
Reproduction, July 2004
DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Moore, Melanie Ball

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,277,197
of 20,710,163 outputs
Outputs from Reproduction
#680
of 2,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,152
of 289,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproduction
#21
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,710,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.