↓ Skip to main content

ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Is Associated with Poor Health Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Is Associated with Poor Health Post-COVID-19 Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Clinical Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.3390/jcm11010224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Anna Motos, Rosario Menéndez, Albert Gabarrús, Jessica González, Laia Fernández-Barat, Adrián Ceccato, Raquel Pérez-Arnal, Dario García-Gasulla, Ricard Ferrer, Jordi Riera, José Lorente, Óscar Peñuelas, Jesús Bermejo-Martin, David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Alejandro Rodríguez, Ferran Barbé, Luciano Aguilera, Rosario Amaya-Villar, Carme Barberà, José Barberán, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Elena Bustamante-Munguira, Jesús Caballero, Cristina Carbajales, Nieves Carbonell, Mercedes Catalán-González, Cristóbal Galbán, Víctor Gumucio-Sanguino, Maria de la Torre, Emili Díaz, Elena Gallego, José García Garmendia, José Garnacho-Montero, José Gómez, Ruth Jorge García, Ana Loza-Vázquez, Judith Marín-Corral, Amalia Martínez de la Gándara, Ignacio Martínez Varela, Juan Lopez Messa, Guillermo Albaiceta, Mariana Novo, Yhivian Peñasco, Pilar Ricart, Luis Urrelo-Cerrón, Angel Sánchez-Miralles, Susana Sancho Chinesta, Lorenzo Socias, Jordi Solé-Violan, Luis Tamayo Lomas, Pablo Vidal, Antoni Torres

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 7 23%
Unspecified 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Unspecified 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#945,900
of 21,763,118 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#316
of 10,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,350
of 478,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,763,118 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.