↓ Skip to main content

Accelerated exon evolution within primate segmental duplications

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accelerated exon evolution within primate segmental duplications
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Belen Lorente-Galdos, Jonathan Bleyhl, Gabriel Santpere, Laura Vives, Oscar Ramírez, Jessica Hernandez, Roger Anglada, Gregory M Cooper, Arcadi Navarro, Evan E Eichler, Tomas Marques-Bonet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of signatures of natural selection has long been used as an approach to understanding the unique features of any given species. Genes within segmental duplications are overlooked in most studies of selection due to the limitations of draft nonhuman genome assemblies and to the methodological reliance on accurate gene trees, which are difficult to obtain for duplicated genes. RESULTS: In this work, we detected exons with an accumulation of high-quality nucleotide differences between the human assembly and shotgun sequencing reads from single human and macaque individuals. Comparing the observed rates of nucleotide differences between coding exons and their flanking intronic sequences with a likelihood-ratio test, we identified 74 exons with evidence for rapid coding sequence evolution during the evolution of humans and Old World monkeys. Fifty-five percent of rapidly evolving exons were either partially or totally duplicated, which is a significant enrichment of the 6% rate observed across all human coding exons. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a more comprehensive view of the action of selection upon segmental duplications, which are the most complex regions of our genomes. In light of these findings, we suggest that segmental duplications could be subjected to rapid evolution more frequently than previously thought.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 63 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 9 13%
Professor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Computer Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,368
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,757
of 290,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#37
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.