You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taxonomy and evolution of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces in the omics era – Past, present and future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.05.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chi-Ching Tsang, James Y.M. Tang, Susanna K.P. Lau, Patrick C.Y. Woo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 260 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 95 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 103 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
#773
of 2,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,002
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.