↓ Skip to main content

Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity.

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 20,603)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
118 news outlets
blogs
28 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
935 tweeters
facebook
161 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
20 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
pinterest
2 Pinners

Readers on

mendeley
857 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity.
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1208051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krista Casazza, Kevin R. Fontaine, Arne Astrup, Leann L. Birch, Andrew W. Brown, Michelle M. Bohan Brown, Nefertiti Durant, Gareth Dutton, E. Michael Foster, Steven B. Heymsfield, Kerry McIver, Tapan Mehta, Nir Menachemi, P.K. Newby, Russell Pate, Barbara J. Rolls, Bisakha Sen, Daniel L. Smith, Diana M. Thomas, David B. Allison, Casazza K, Fontaine KR, Astrup A, Birch LL, Brown AW, Bohan Brown MM, Durant N, Dutton G, Foster EM, Heymsfield SB, McIver K, Mehta T, Menachemi N, Newby PK, Pate R, Rolls BJ, Sen B, Smith DL Jr, Thomas DM, Allison DB, Casazza, Krista, Daniel L. Smith, Jr., Fontaine, Kevin R., Astrup, Arne, Birch, Leann L., Brown, Andrew W., Bohan Brown, Michelle M., Durant, Nefertiti, Dutton, Gareth, Foster, E. Michael, Heymsfield, Steven B., McIver, Kerry, Mehta, Tapan, Menachemi, Nir, Newby, P.K., Pate, Russell, Rolls, Barbara J., Sen, Bisakha, Smith, Daniel L. Jr., Thomas, Diana M., Allison, David B.

Abstract

Many beliefs about obesity persist in the absence of supporting scientific evidence (presumptions); some persist despite contradicting evidence (myths). The promulgation of unsupported beliefs may yield poorly informed policy decisions, inaccurate clinical and public health recommendations, and an unproductive allocation of research resources and may divert attention away from useful, evidence-based information.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 935 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 857 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 34 4%
Brazil 12 1%
United Kingdom 11 1%
Spain 8 <1%
Italy 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 27 3%
Unknown 741 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 167 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 15%
Student > Master 101 12%
Other 91 11%
Student > Postgraduate 68 8%
Other 299 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 409 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 15%
Psychology 75 9%
Social Sciences 54 6%
Unspecified 37 4%
Other 150 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1952. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#382
of 8,665,693 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#19
of 20,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 300,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,665,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.