↓ Skip to main content

Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity.

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 24,046)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
121 news outlets
blogs
28 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
935 tweeters
facebook
164 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
20 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
pinterest
2 Pinners
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
843 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity.
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1208051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krista Casazza, Kevin R. Fontaine, Arne Astrup, Leann L. Birch, Andrew W. Brown, Michelle M. Bohan Brown, Nefertiti Durant, Gareth Dutton, E. Michael Foster, Steven B. Heymsfield, Kerry McIver, Tapan Mehta, Nir Menachemi, P.K. Newby, Russell Pate, Barbara J. Rolls, Bisakha Sen, Daniel L. Smith, Diana M. Thomas, David B. Allison, Casazza K, Fontaine KR, Astrup A, Birch LL, Brown AW, Bohan Brown MM, Durant N, Dutton G, Foster EM, Heymsfield SB, McIver K, Mehta T, Menachemi N, Newby PK, Pate R, Rolls BJ, Sen B, Smith DL Jr, Thomas DM, Allison DB, Casazza, Krista, Daniel L. Smith, Jr., Fontaine, Kevin R., Astrup, Arne, Birch, Leann L., Brown, Andrew W., Bohan Brown, Michelle M., Durant, Nefertiti, Dutton, Gareth, Foster, E. Michael, Heymsfield, Steven B., McIver, Kerry, Mehta, Tapan, Menachemi, Nir, Newby, P.K., Pate, Russell, Rolls, Barbara J., Sen, Bisakha, Smith, Daniel L. Jr., Thomas, Diana M., Allison, David B.

Abstract

Many beliefs about obesity persist in the absence of supporting scientific evidence (presumptions); some persist despite contradicting evidence (myths). The promulgation of unsupported beliefs may yield poorly informed policy decisions, inaccurate clinical and public health recommendations, and an unproductive allocation of research resources and may divert attention away from useful, evidence-based information.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 935 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 3%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Brazil 10 1%
Spain 8 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 743 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 161 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 14%
Student > Master 100 12%
Other 91 11%
Student > Postgraduate 69 8%
Other 302 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 390 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 15%
Psychology 71 8%
Unspecified 51 6%
Social Sciences 47 6%
Other 161 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1973. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#557
of 11,797,702 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#31
of 24,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 305,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,797,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.