You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Matthijs Bal, Martijn Veltkamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 10 | 6% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 72 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 140 | 81% |
| Scientists | 16 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 595 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 579 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 13% |
| Researcher | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 17% |
| Unknown | 140 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 169 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 76 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 66 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 18 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 96 | 16% |
| Unknown | 153 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 953. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,863
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#267
of 225,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70
of 292,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#7
of 5,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.