You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Positive Outcomes Influence the Rate and Time to Publication, but Not the Impact Factor of Publications of Clinical Trial Results
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054583 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pilar Suñé, Josep Maria Suñé, J. Bruno Montoro |
Abstract |
Publication bias may affect the validity of evidence based medical decisions. The aim of this study is to assess whether research outcomes affect the dissemination of clinical trial findings, in terms of rate, time to publication, and impact factor of journal publications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
Sweden | 3 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 7% |
United States | 3 | 7% |
Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 64% |
Scientists | 8 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 19 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 26% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,149,148
of 24,456,171 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,923
of 211,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,357
of 291,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#334
of 5,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,456,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.