↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the effect of expert elicitation techniques on population status assessment in the face of large uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the effect of expert elicitation techniques on population status assessment in the face of large uncertainty
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, January 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114453
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer F Moore, Julien Martin, Hardin Waddle, Evan H Campbell Grant, Jill Fleming, Eve Bohnett, Thomas S B Akre, Donald J Brown, Michael T Jones, Jessica R Meck, Kevin Oxenrider, Anthony Tur, Lisabeth L Willey, Fred Johnson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Decision Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,878,106
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Management
#628
of 6,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,621
of 534,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Management
#16
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.