You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2752-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong M. Kwon, Hans Gerdes, Mark A. Schattner, Karen T. Brown, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Stephen B. Solomon, Michael I. D’Angelica, William R. Jarnagin, Peter J. Allen, Christopher J. DiMaio |
| Abstract |
Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) occur in up to 30 % of patients following partial pancreatic resections. Traditionally, postoperative PFCs are managed via percutaneous drainage (PD). EUS-guided transgastric drainage has been shown to be effective for the management of PFCs secondary to acute pancreatitis. However, there are limited data on the use of EUS-guided drainage (EUSD) for the management of postoperative PFCs. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |