You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Qualitative study of candidacy and access to secondary mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Science & Medicine, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114711 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Liberati, Natalie Richards, Jennie Parker, Janet Willars, David Scott, Nicola Boydell, Vanessa Pinfold, Graham Martin, Peter B. Jones, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 58% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 52% |
| Scientists | 15 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,312,295
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#1,307
of 12,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,296
of 520,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#26
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.