↓ Skip to main content

Ribosome Traffic on mRNAs Maps to Gene Ontology: Genome-wide Quantification of Translation Initiation Rates and Polysome Size Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ribosome Traffic on mRNAs Maps to Gene Ontology: Genome-wide Quantification of Translation Initiation Rates and Polysome Size Regulation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Ciandrini, Ian Stansfield, M. Carmen Romano

Abstract

To understand the complex relationship governing transcript abundance and the level of the encoded protein, we integrate genome-wide experimental data of ribosomal density on mRNAs with a novel stochastic model describing ribosome traffic dynamics during translation elongation. This analysis reveals that codon arrangement, rather than simply codon bias, has a key role in determining translational efficiency. It also reveals that translation output is governed both by initiation efficiency and elongation dynamics. By integrating genome-wide experimental data sets with simulation of ribosome traffic on all Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORFs, mRNA-specific translation initiation rates are for the first time estimated across the entire transcriptome. Our analysis identifies different classes of mRNAs characterised by their initiation rates, their ribosome traffic dynamics, and by their response to ribosome availability. Strikingly, this classification based on translational dynamics maps onto key gene ontological classifications, revealing evolutionary optimisation of translation responses to be strongly influenced by gene function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 152 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 27%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 24%
Physics and Astronomy 11 6%
Computer Science 9 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 22 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,754
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,842
of 290,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#99
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.