↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide identification of the genetic basis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
178 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide identification of the genetic basis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Published in
Neuron, January 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sai Zhang, Johnathan Cooper-Knock, Annika K. Weimer, Minyi Shi, Tobias Moll, Jack N.G. Marshall, Calum Harvey, Helia Ghahremani Nezhad, John Franklin, Cleide dos Santos Souza, Ke Ning, Cheng Wang, Jingjing Li, Allison A. Dilliott, Sali Farhan, Eran Elhaik, Iris Pasniceanu, Matthew R. Livesey, Chen Eitan, Eran Hornstein, Kevin P. Kenna, Project MinE ALS Sequencing Consortium, Ian Blair, Naomi R. Wray, Matthew Kiernan, Miguel Mitne Neto, Adriano Chio, Ruben Cauchi, Wim Robberecht, Philip van Damme, Philippe Corcia, Philippe Couratier, Orla Hardiman, Russell McLaughin, Marc Gotkine, Vivian Drory, Nicola Ticozzi, Vincenzo Silani, Jan H. Veldink, Leonard H. van den Berg, Mamede de Carvalho, Jesus S. Mora Pardina, Monica Povedano, Peter Andersen, Markus Weber, Nazli A. Başak, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Chris Shaw, Pamela J. Shaw, Karen E. Morrison, John E. Landers, Jonathan D. Glass, Jan H. Veldink, Laura Ferraiuolo, Pamela J. Shaw, Michael P. Snyder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Other 15 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 80 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Neuroscience 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 89 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#213,035
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#284
of 9,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,574
of 517,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#8
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.