You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa M Ferreira, Stefan K Piechnik, Erica Dall’Armellina, Theodoros D Karamitsos, Jane M Francis, Robin P Choudhury, Matthias G Friedrich, Matthew D Robson, Stefan Neubauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 16% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 53% |
| Engineering | 28 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,645,910
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,092
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,634
of 178,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.