↓ Skip to main content

Antimalarials exert a cardioprotective effect in lupus patients: Insights from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Register (RELESSER) analysis of factors associated with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,420)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimalarials exert a cardioprotective effect in lupus patients: Insights from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Register (RELESSER) analysis of factors associated with heart failure
Published in
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, February 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.11.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa, David Rúa-Figueroa, Natalia Pérez-Veiga, Ana M. Anzola, María Galindo-Izquierdo, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Antonio Fernández-Nebro, Clara Sangüesa, Raúl Menor-Almagro, Eva Tomero, Natividad del Val, Esther Uriarte-Isazelaya, Ricardo Blanco, José L. Andreu, Alina Boteanu, Javier Narváez, Tatiana Cobo, Cristina Bohórquez, Carlos Montilla, Esteban Salas, Francisco J. Toyos, José A. Bernal, Eva Salgado, Mercedes Freire, Antonio J. Mas, Lorena Expósito, José A. Hernández-Beriain, Oihane Ibarguengoitia, María L. Velloso-Feijoo, Nuria Lozano-Rivas, Gemma Bonilla, Mireia Moreno, Inmaculada Jiménez, Víctor Quevedo-Vila, Angela Pecondón, Elena Aurrecoechea, Elia Valls, Coral Mouriño, Tomás Vázquez-Rodríguez, José M. Pego-Reigosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 11%
Professor 3 9%
Librarian 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Unspecified 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#933,503
of 21,753,060 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#41
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,525
of 400,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,753,060 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.