You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19: a multicenter study of 150 lumbar punctures in 127 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-021-02339-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sven Jarius, Florence Pache, Peter Körtvelyessy, Ilijas Jelčić, Mark Stettner, Diego Franciotta, Emanuela Keller, Bernhard Neumann, Marius Ringelstein, Makbule Senel, Axel Regeniter, Rea Kalantzis, Jan F. Willms, Achim Berthele, Markus Busch, Marco Capobianco, Amanda Eisele, Ina Reichen, Rick Dersch, Sebastian Rauer, Katharina Sandner, Ilya Ayzenberg, Catharina C. Gross, Harald Hegen, Michael Khalil, Ingo Kleiter, Thorsten Lenhard, Jürgen Haas, Orhan Aktas, Klemens Angstwurm, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Jan Lewerenz, Hayrettin Tumani, Friedemann Paul, Martin Stangel, Klemens Ruprecht, Brigitte Wildemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 21% |
| Germany | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,278,789
of 26,135,447 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#106
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,883
of 529,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#3
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,135,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.