↓ Skip to main content

Health-related quality of life and economic impact of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health-related quality of life and economic impact of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity associated with a neurologic condition: a systematic review
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crisanta I Tapia, Kristin Khalaf, Karina Berenson, Denise Globe, Michael Chancellor, Lesley K Carr

Abstract

Patients with neurologic diseases often have neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), which can result in a loss of voluntary bladder control and uncontrollable urinary incontinence (UI).The impact of UI due to NDO on patients' lives has not been well studied. The objective of this review was to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and economic burden in patients with urgency UI due to NDO in select countries in North America, the European Union, Asia, and Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 55 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,657,412
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,181
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,121
of 286,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#57
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.