The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychedelic injustice: should bioethics tune in to the voices of psychedelic-using communities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Humanities, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medhum-2021-012299 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Miceli McMillan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,669,918
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Medical Humanities
#153
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,782
of 516,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Humanities
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.