You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2021.24110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew E. Oster, David K. Shay, John R. Su, Julianne Gee, C. Buddy Creech, Karen R. Broder, Kathryn Edwards, Jonathan H. Soslow, Jeffrey M. Dendy, Elizabeth Schlaudecker, Sean M. Lang, Elizabeth D. Barnett, Frederick L. Ruberg, Michael J. Smith, M. Jay Campbell, Renato D. Lopes, Laurence S. Sperling, Jane A. Baumblatt, Deborah L. Thompson, Paige L. Marquez, Penelope Strid, Jared Woo, River Pugsley, Sarah Reagan-Steiner, Frank DeStefano, Tom T. Shimabukuro |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45,909 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6663 | 15% |
| Brazil | 2377 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1006 | 2% |
| Canada | 1003 | 2% |
| Germany | 494 | 1% |
| France | 449 | <1% |
| Spain | 422 | <1% |
| Australia | 354 | <1% |
| Japan | 279 | <1% |
| Other | 4155 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28707 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44281 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 642 | 1% |
| Scientists | 562 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 315 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 367 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 156 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 154 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18517. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#41
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2
of 34,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4
of 510,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.