↓ Skip to main content

Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007904.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda Nugent, Sian Lewis, Joe M O'Sullivan

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2010.For many patients with head and neck cancer, oral nutrition will not provide adequate nourishment during treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy due to the acute toxicity of treatment, obstruction caused by the tumour, or both. The optimal method of enteral feeding for this patient group has yet to be established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 24%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,669,118
of 14,418,392 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,542
of 10,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,254
of 243,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#279
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,418,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.