You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Concurrent Takayasu Arteritis and Vascular Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome: A Case Report
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2022
Kyota Hashimoto, Ryota Sakai, Akiko Shibata, Yusuke Okada, Syoichi Yoshinaga, Takahiko Kurasawa, Tsuneo Kondo, Koichi Amano
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||17%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||17%|
|Student > Master||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||17%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
of 8,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 509,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
of 839 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 839 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.