↓ Skip to main content

Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?
Published in
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolin Eberl, Reinout W. Wiers, Steffen Pawelczack, Mike Rinck, Eni S. Becker, Johannes Lindenmeyer

Abstract

Alcoholism is a progressive neurocognitive developmental disorder. Recent evidence shows that computerized training interventions (Cognitive Bias Modification, CBM) can reverse some of these maladaptively changed neurocognitive processes. A first clinical study of a CBM, called alcohol-avoidance training, found that trained alcoholic patients showed less relapse at one-year follow-up than control patients. The present study tested the replication of this result, and questions about mediation and moderation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 212 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 25%
Student > Master 53 23%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 153 67%
Unspecified 27 12%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 18 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,006,061
of 12,101,790 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#130
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,394
of 291,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them