↓ Skip to main content

Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007825.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayes SL, Mann MK, Morgan FM, Kitcher H, Kelly MJ, Weightman AL, Hayes, Sara L, Mann, Mala K, Morgan, Fiona M, Kitcher, Hilary, Kelly, Mark J, Weightman, Alison L

Abstract

In many countries, national, regional and local inter- and intra-agency collaborations have been introduced in order to improve health outcomes. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of locally-developed partnerships which target changes in individual health outcomes and behaviours.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 31%
Student > Master 13 15%
Other 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Psychology 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Decision Sciences 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,107,936
of 14,432,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,802
of 10,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,428
of 243,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#248
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,432,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.