You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Review: A systematic review of quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01427.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Townsend‐White, A. N. T. Pham, M. V. Vassos |
Abstract |
The quality of life (QOL) construct is proposed as a method to assess service outcomes for people utilising disability services. With this in mind, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of available QOL measures for people with intellectual disability (ID) to pinpoint psychometrically sound measures that can be routinely used for service evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 170 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 43 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 41 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,445,255
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#553
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,956
of 126,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.