↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of the wheat (triticum aestivum L.) transcriptome by de novo assembly for the discovery of phosphate starvation-responsive genes: gene expression in Pi-stressed wheat

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation of the wheat (triticum aestivum L.) transcriptome by de novo assembly for the discovery of phosphate starvation-responsive genes: gene expression in Pi-stressed wheat
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youko Oono, Fuminori Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Kawahara, Takayuki Yazawa, Hirokazu Handa, Takeshi Itoh, Takashi Matsumoto

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and development. To modulate their P homeostasis, plants must balance P uptake, mobilisation, and partitioning to various organs. Despite the worldwide importance of wheat as a cultivated food crop, molecular mechanisms associated with phosphate (Pi) starvation in wheat remain unclear. To elucidate these mechanisms, we used RNA-Seq methods to generate transcriptome profiles of the wheat variety 'Chinese Spring' responding to 10 days of Pi starvation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 29%
Researcher 39 24%
Student > Master 18 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 13%
Computer Science 5 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 19 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,073,942
of 12,378,087 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,821
of 7,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,615
of 267,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#104
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,378,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.