↓ Skip to main content

Content validity and measurement properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with fractures of the lower extremities: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Content validity and measurement properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with fractures of the lower extremities: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00417-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Ratter, Sylvia Pellekooren, Suzanne Wiertsema, Johanna M. van Dongen, Edwin Geleijn, Vincent de Groot, Frank W. Bloemers, Elise Jansma, Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 38%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,228,623
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#186
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,476
of 503,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.