↓ Skip to main content

Content validity and measurement properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with fractures of the lower extremities: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Content validity and measurement properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with fractures of the lower extremities: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00417-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Ratter, Sylvia Pellekooren, Suzanne Wiertsema, Johanna M. van Dongen, Edwin Geleijn, Vincent de Groot, Frank W. Bloemers, Elise Jansma, Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 17 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 19 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#13,408,367
of 23,964,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#180
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,157
of 505,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,964,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.