↓ Skip to main content

Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Maheshwari A, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP, Nastri, Carolina O, Gibreel, Ahmed, Raine-Fenning, Nick, Maheshwari, Abha, Ferriani, Rui A, Bhattacharya, Siladitya, Martins, Wellington P

Abstract

Implantation of an embryo within the endometrial cavity is a key step in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). It has been suggested that intentional endometrial injury, such as endometrial biopsy or curettage, prior to embryo transfer improves the chances of implantation and further development thereby increasing the likelihood of live birth. The effectiveness and safety of this procedure is, however, still unclear.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Librarian 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,650,213
of 7,030,920 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,234
of 8,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,738
of 294,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#349
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,030,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.