You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time-trends in survival in young women with breast cancer in a SEER population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-013-2425-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Foluso O. Ademuyiwa, Adrienne Groman, Chi-Chen Hong, Austin Miller, Shicha Kumar, Ellis Levine, Deborah Erwin, Christine Ambrosone |
| Abstract |
Mortality improvements in young women with breast cancer (BC) may be attributable to treatment advances; screening likely plays a less significant role as mammography is not recommended <40. We examined time-trends in outcome in a cohort of young women. Our goal was to determine the contributions of treatment and screening to mortality improvements and evaluate whether differential outcomes by ER status exist. Using SEER, patients (73,447) were divided into three categories by diagnosis year (1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004) and also categorized as <40 or 40-50 years. Multivariate analysis was done to investigate the association of survival with time period for both age groups by ER status. Hazard ratios (HR) for mortality in women 40-50 with ER positive BC declined over time. With 1990-1994 as referent, the HR in 1995-1999 was 0.77 (0.69-0.86) and 0.65 (0.59-0.71) in 2000-2004 (p < 0.001). Women <40 with ER positive BC also had improvements over time. In ER negative patients, the degree of improvements over time was less than that seen in ER positive women. We report a survival disparity over time in young women by ER status. Patients with ER negative disease have not had the degree of improvements over time as seen in ER positive disease. Therefore, mortality improvements in young women with ER positive BC may be attributed to treatment advances with endocrine agents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,327,422
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,682
of 4,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,108
of 282,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#35
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.