You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Added Value of Patient Engagement in Early Dialogue at EMA: Scientific Advice as a Case Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.811855 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aisling Murphy, Nathalie Bere, Spiros Vamvakas, Maria Mavris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 6 | 12% |
Spain | 4 | 8% |
France | 3 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
North Macedonia | 3 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,092,233
of 24,988,588 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#299
of 6,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,246
of 512,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#25
of 624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.