You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
7-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination in England and Wales: Is It Still Beneficial Despite High Levels of Serotype Replacement?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoon Hong Choi, Mark Jit, Nigel Gay, Nick Andrews, Pauline A. Waight, Alessia Melegaro, Robert George, Elizabeth Miller |
| Abstract |
The UK introduced the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) into the national vaccination program in September 2006. Previous modelling assumed that the likely impact of PCV7 on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) would be similar to the US experience with PCV7. However, recent surveillance data show a more rapid replacement of PCV7 IPD cases by non-PCV7 IPD cases than was seen in the US. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#4,425,699
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#60,705
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,518
of 136,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#590
of 2,564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.