You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analogical reasoning in baboons (Papio papio): Flexible reencoding of the source relation depending on the target relation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Learning & Behavior, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13420-012-0101-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joël Fagot, Anaïs Maugard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 12 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 26 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#404
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,982
of 289,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.