You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence and Risk Factors for Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Delhi Region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0055299 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chhavi Porwal, Amit Kaushik, Nayani Makkar, Jayant N. Banavaliker, Mahmud Hanif, Rupak Singla, Anuj K. Bhatnagar, Digambar Behera, Jitendra Nath Pande, Urvashi B. Singh |
| Abstract |
India with a major burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) does not have national level data on this hazardous disease. Since 2006, emergence of extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) is considered a serious threat to global TB control. This study highlights the demographic and clinical risk factors associated with XDR-TB in Delhi. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#12,751,882
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#99,380
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,692
of 283,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,386
of 5,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.