You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suplementação com açaí (Euterpe Oleracea Martius) para o tratamento do zumbido crônico: efeitos na percepção, níveis de ansiedade e biomarcadores de metabolismo oxidativo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila Jacques Oppitz, Michele Vargas Garcia, Rúbia Soares Bruno, Cleide Monteiro Zemolin, Bruna Olegário Baptista, Bárbara Osmarin Turra, Fernanda Barbisan, Ivana Beatrice Mânica da Cruz, Aron Ferreira da Silveira |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,848,489
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#4
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,704
of 509,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.