Title |
RND multidrug efflux pumps: what are they good for?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolina Alvarez-Ortega, Jorge Olivares, José L. Martínez |
Abstract |
Multidrug efflux pumps are chromosomally encoded genetic elements capable of mediating resistance to toxic compounds in several life forms. In bacteria, these elements are involved in intrinsic and acquired resistance to antibiotics. Unlike other well-known horizontally acquired antibiotic resistance determinants, genes encoding for multidrug efflux pumps belong to the core of bacterial genomes and thus have evolved over millions of years. The selective pressure stemming from the use of antibiotics to treat bacterial infections is relatively recent in evolutionary terms. Therefore, it is unlikely that these elements have evolved in response to antibiotics. In the last years, several studies have identified numerous functions for efflux pumps that go beyond antibiotic extrusion. In this review we present some examples of these functions that range from bacterial interactions with plant or animal hosts, to the detoxification of metabolic intermediates or the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Ireland | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Estonia | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 350 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 56 | 16% |
Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
Researcher | 44 | 12% |
Professor | 21 | 6% |
Other | 51 | 14% |
Unknown | 62 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 119 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 6% |
Chemistry | 14 | 4% |
Other | 40 | 11% |
Unknown | 64 | 18% |