↓ Skip to main content

Enhancer RNAs

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Enhancer RNAs
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Enhancer RNAs
Chapter number 9
Book title
Enhancer RNAs
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-4035-6_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-4033-2, 978-1-4939-4035-6
Authors

Gardini, Alessandro, Alessandro Gardini Ph.D., Alessandro Gardini

Editors

Ulf Andersson Ørom

Abstract

Transcription occurring at gene loci results in accumulation of mature RNA molecules (i.e., mRNAs) that can be easily assayed by RT-PCR or RNA sequencing. However, the steady-state level of RNA does not accurately mirror transcriptional activity per se. In fact, RNA stability plays a major role in determining the relative abundance of any given RNA molecule. Here, I describe a protocol of Nuclear Run-On assay coupled to deep sequencing to assess real-time transcription from engaged RNA polymerase. Mapping nascent transcripts at the genome-wide scale provides a reliable measure of transcriptional activity in mammalian cells and delivers a high-resolution map of coding and noncoding transcripts that is especially useful for annotation and quantification of short-lived RNA molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 30%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,817,005
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,243
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,420
of 420,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#637
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.