You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human Fear Conditioning and Extinction in Neuroimaging: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005865 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Sehlmeyer, Sonja Schöning, Pienie Zwitserlood, Bettina Pfleiderer, Tilo Kircher, Volker Arolt, Carsten Konrad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 575 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 147 | 24% |
| Researcher | 116 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 124 | 20% |
| Unknown | 77 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 252 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 76 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 7% |
| Unknown | 118 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,314,046
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#176,428
of 216,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,675
of 118,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#474
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.