↓ Skip to main content

A substrate-driven allosteric switch that enhances PDI catalytic activity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A substrate-driven allosteric switch that enhances PDI catalytic activity
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roelof H. Bekendam, Pavan K. Bendapudi, Lin Lin, Partha P. Nag, Jun Pu, Daniel R. Kennedy, Alexandra Feldenzer, Joyce Chiu, Kristina M. Cook, Bruce Furie, Mingdong Huang, Philip J. Hogg, Robert Flaumenhaft

Abstract

Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is an oxidoreductase essential for folding proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. The domain structure of PDI is a-b-b'-x-a', wherein the thioredoxin-like a and a' domains mediate disulfide bond shuffling and b and b' domains are substrate binding. The b' and a' domains are connected via the x-linker, a 19-amino-acid flexible peptide. Here we identify a class of compounds, termed bepristats, that target the substrate-binding pocket of b'. Bepristats reversibly block substrate binding and inhibit platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in vivo. Ligation of the substrate-binding pocket by bepristats paradoxically enhances catalytic activity of a and a' by displacing the x-linker, which acts as an allosteric switch to augment reductase activity in the catalytic domains. This substrate-driven allosteric switch is also activated by peptides and proteins and is present in other thiol isomerases. Our results demonstrate a mechanism whereby binding of a substrate to thiol isomerases enhances catalytic activity of remote domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 11 15%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Chemistry 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,286,020
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#36,288
of 57,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,541
of 348,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#527
of 867 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 867 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.