↓ Skip to main content

Estimated HIV Incidence in California, 2006–2009

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated HIV Incidence in California, 2006–2009
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Scheer, Shoshanna Nakelsky, Trista Bingham, Mark Damesyn, Dan Sun, Chi-Sheng Chin, Anthony Buckman, Karen E. Mark

Abstract

Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial for prioritizing, targeting, and evaluating HIV prevention efforts. Using the methodology the CDC used to estimate national HIV incidence, we estimated HIV incidence in Los Angeles County (LAC), San Francisco (SF), and California's remaining counties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Social Sciences 7 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Psychology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,099,045
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,264
of 193,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,225
of 282,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,802
of 5,040 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,040 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.