You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew E. Falagas, Angeliki Zarkali, Drosos E. Karageorgopoulos, Vangelis Bardakas, Michael N. Mavros |
Abstract |
The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 13% |
Japan | 2 | 9% |
India | 2 | 9% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Librarian | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 38 | 27% |
Unknown | 30 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
Computer Science | 17 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
Other | 35 | 25% |
Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,363,074
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,125
of 221,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,181
of 291,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#388
of 5,061 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,061 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.