↓ Skip to main content

Sometimes Bayesian statistics are better

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sometimes Bayesian statistics are better
Published in
Nature, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/494035b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Herzog, Dirk Ostwald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 5 2%
Chile 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 197 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 28%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Professor 13 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 12 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 22 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,586,029
of 24,288,533 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,344
of 94,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,383
of 291,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#520
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.