You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054973 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Roll, Thomas Reinhold, Daniel Pach, Benno Brinkhaus, Katja Icke, Doris Staab, Tanja Jäckel, Karl Wegscheider, Stefan N. Willich, Claudia M. Witt |
| Abstract |
One in five children visiting a homeopathic physician suffers from atopic eczema. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 16% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Antarctica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#691,768
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,365
of 215,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,538
of 293,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#203
of 5,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.