You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improved Xenobiotic Metabolism and Reduced Susceptibility to Cancer in Gluten-Sensitive Macaques upon Introduction of a Gluten-Free Diet
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018648 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karol Sestak, Lauren Conroy, Pyone P. Aye, Smriti Mehra, Gaby G. Doxiadis, Deepak Kaushal |
Abstract |
A non-human primate (NHP) model of gluten sensitivity was employed to study the gene perturbations associated with dietary gluten changes in small intestinal tissues from gluten-sensitive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 26% |
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,679,313
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,421
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,220
of 108,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,250
of 1,480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.