↓ Skip to main content

Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brien CJ, Berger B, Rabie H, Tester M, Chris J Brien, Bettina Berger, Huwaida Rabie, Mark Tester

Abstract

There are a number of unresolved issues in the design of experiments in greenhouses. They include whether statistical designs should be used and, if so, which designs should be used. Also, are there thigmomorphogenic or other effects arising from the movement of plants on conveyor belts within a greenhouse? A two-phase, single-line wheat experiment involving four tactics was conducted in a conventional greenhouse and a fully-automated phenotyping greenhouse (Smarthouse) to investigate these issues.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 7 7%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 73%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Mathematics 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,323,444
of 15,010,975 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#247
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,287
of 249,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,010,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.