You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low-Cost Forensics Reveal High Rates of Non-lethal Snaring and Shotgun Injuries in Zambia's Large Carnivores
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.803381 |
Authors |
Paula A. White, Blaire Van Valkenburgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 7 | 3% |
India | 7 | 3% |
Finland | 6 | 3% |
Mexico | 6 | 3% |
Poland | 5 | 2% |
United States | 5 | 2% |
Brazil | 4 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
Czechia | 3 | 1% |
Other | 47 | 21% |
Unknown | 134 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 210 | 92% |
Scientists | 14 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 363. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#90,172
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#7
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,974
of 531,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.