↓ Skip to main content

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011347.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijay Tailor, Siobhan Ludden, Manuela Bossi, Catey Bunce, John A Greenwood, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 52 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Unspecified 11 11%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 57 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,753,208
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,001
of 12,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,606
of 511,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.