↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic biology, the bioeconomy, and a societal quandary

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biotechnology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthetic biology, the bioeconomy, and a societal quandary
Published in
Trends in Biotechnology, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim C. Philp, Rachael J. Ritchie, Jacqueline E.M. Allan

Abstract

Opinions on what synthetic biology actually is range from a natural extension of genetic engineering to a new manufacturing paradigm. It offers, for the first time in the life sciences, rational design and engineering standardisation. It could address problems across a broad spectrum of human concerns, including energy and food security, and health of growing and aging populations. It also offers great scope for public resistance to its introduction to daily life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Pakistan 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 78 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 40%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 6 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,342,888
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#621
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,245
of 292,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.